Day 4 - Designing for the User Experience
Oh and I thought I'd finished...
we had a presentation this morning which was really very interesting. A nice example of the difference of designing for experience was "design a vase" versus "design a way for people to enjot flowers in their home". Simple but effective.
Then it went into a great case study about redesigning a library system. It was one of those ones where you sit and think "I want that job...". The slides from this are going to be available at www.marcrettig.com/uxweek and when they're up there later today I storngly recommend you go and have a look - its a really nice visual represntation of the tools - their personas and their tools - nicely put together and very clear. In particular take a look at the Design Principles slide. Essentially it was an entire re-design of a library - from the physical architecture, the signage to the online system.
What was really interesting was they took an online experience (amazon) and applied it offline. So when a customer checks out of the library they get a little ditty with their printout saying "if you like this, you'd also like..." so it entices them to return and they get a feel for the depth of content within the library.
A nice thing they did was they started the project off by carrying out 3 scenarios - and they did it themselves.....acting out an experience not just "doing a task" (3 different people had to find a specific book in 3 different ways from online to physically hunting it out in the library). that was their starting point for finding the issues...then mapping personas...finding "breakpoints" which drove the design opportunities (very interesting - find that slide too)... But they did everything to provide design principles and how the whole experience maps together....including providing logic of where to put signage....and changing object signs to task oriented (reference desk became "ask a librarian" - intuitive and also gives affordance - you know you're allowed to ask). After the design was finished (you can imagine this was a huge project) they carried out the same scenarios again to see if it worked better. (refer to my continuing beef about use the same tasks across different testing sessions - something we still haven't managed to do).
Just an interesting porject to listen to and some really nice ways to use the different tools. Worth digging around in these slides.

2 Comments:
We spend a lot of time trying to map real world metaphors to the online experience. It's interesting that we're now seeing successful online techniques being used in the real world. I didn't notice Blockbuster making movie recommendations (If you liked movie A, you might also like these movies) until the online stores started using it. It makes sense that libraries, with your history of previous books checked out, can make recommendations.
(disclaimer: I was one of the MAYAns who worked on the library project)...
You can also read press about the carnegie library's efforts here... (basically a taste of the results)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6199275/
What was fun about this project was that a year later another of the library's branches opened, and by following the IA and our guidelines (and by doing quite of bit of hands on experimentation themselves), the librarians and staff did it all themselves!
Each of the 5 libraries that underwent this transformation were designed by different architects for different neighborhoods but the experience feels remarkably consistent (more thanks to the staff and their passion for doing this than from our guidance I sometimes suspect... they became seriously passionate about the idea of actually thinking about the users but never knew how to do it before).
For proof, check out the carnegie library's own presentations and ruminations on information architecture and the redesign here...
http://www.carnegielibrary.org/presentations/
This wasn't a pretty project or a short one and it had more political architecture than anything else (getting a system to adopt new thinking is the really hard part)...
but it did give all of the parties a rationale for making decisions (rather than leaving it up to fashion)...
Post a Comment
<< Home